/   yicyf.com     Food   / English  

2019-11-21 08:10:06

The U.S. Catholic Church pushed what it called a key reform to address its exploding clergy sex abuse scandal almost two decades ago: Mandatory review boards with lay people in each diocese to review the claims of victims fairly and kindly.

But It often hasn’t worked that way, an Associated Press investigation has found. Instead, boards appointed by bishops and operating in secrecy have routinely served as a way to undermine the claims of sexual abuse from victims, avoid payouts and shield pedophile priests — ultimately raising the question of whether the church is able to reform itself on its own.

The AP investigation found:

- Across the country, bishops have masked these boards in secrecy, often hiding who serves on them and how they handle cases.

- Bishops appoint the very people supposed to defend abuse victims, and have sometimes put church defense attorneys and top aides on boards.

- A few clergy who later accused of sexual misconduct were themselves board members.

- Bishops choose the cases and evidence going before boards, and in some cases even board members were not told about abuse or lied to.

- Even when a review board affirms a victim’s case, some bishops have overruled them.

- In dozens of cases, secular courts or government investigators later decided abuse was credible after boards had said it was not.

___

The full story can be found at apnews.com.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC.


washingtontimes.com The Associated Press
boards abuse church catholic victims reviewing fail bishops cases have washingtontimes review


User comments